The cost of not giving re-directional feedback
People are generally at the extremes of a
spectrum when it comes to giving re-directional feedback. They either end up
damaging people by giving feedback in a blunt manner or clamming up because of
fear.
I was doing a session on feedback and team member performance development conversation last month when I shared this image as a precursor to introducing the participants to the neurological levels framework from Robert Dilts's work in NLP.
This was the simplest infographic I could find
in a sea of complex images that showcase what all lies beneath the surface of
behaviour.
Well it triggered a profound insight in one of
the participants.
He wanted to confirm if not calling out bad
behaviour, tolerating it and not giving re-directional feedback will only strengthen the
negative loop between a person's internal beliefs and their external negative
behaviour?
I said yes.
And said further that, that is why managers are
responsible to give feedback in case of inappropriate behaviour and align
people to higher order values and beliefs through a proper conversation/
experiential process that leads to the appropriate behaviour.
Otherwise, tolerating such behaviour under the
convenient umbrella of misplaced-compassion will only normalise such behaviour
and lead to a toxic environment and attrition, among other things.
(Image source:
http://www.coaching.net.nz/how-not-to-act-insanely/)
Comments
Post a Comment